By Arveent Kathirtchelvan

Amongst members of the cabinet, YBM Yeo Bee Yin manages to consistently get numerous plaudits on her achievements and qualifications. The Cambridge postgraduate never fails to impress the masses with her strong stances and boldness in handling environmental matters alongside scientific advancement. However, it seems that this universal acclaim is misguided, as I will show that YBM Yeo’s handling of her ministry is, at best, Jekyll and Hyde like or, at worst, visionless populism.

On Energy

YBM Yeo seems to have the nation’s interest at heart when she tackles climate change with her plan of championing renewable energy. However, multiple reports have shown that her plans are disproportionately focused on solar power and, even then, only focuses on reducing peak demand. Peak demand is the highest electrical power demand when the maximum amount of electricity used within a given time period. There is no rolling reform of the electricity grid to move away from fossil fuels, nor is there any plan to deal with producing continuous streams of electricity instead of intermittent power producers like solar power.

Perhaps her focus is on boosting Malaysia’s production of solar panels for domestic use. If this is so, YBM Yeo has obviously taken the safe route to stick with a technology that already exists no matter how poorly it addressed the central problem of climate change. In this sense, peddling solar power is an exercise in making herself seem like a green minister when, in actual fact, her steps forward are minimal at best. Can YBM Yeo answer the problem of heightened land use for utility scale solar? How about resource depletion, or solar waste management, the latter of which does not exist in any mature measurable capacity at this moment? How about smoothing the grid from solar’s intermittency, for which gas peaking is usually used, a fossil fuel technology that is extremely expensive?

Whilst she has talked about increasing energy efficiency, not enough of a plan is laid out and even this is not enough to address climate change effectively. The issue with YBM Yeo is that her admittedly brilliant scientific mind has been clouded with political bias. For addressing the issue of energy, under her ministry already existed the Malaysian Nuclear Power Corporation (MNPC) which has done a lot of research into the viability of nuclear power for Malaysia. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) even rated the MNPC as having done sufficient work to move on to sourcing for vendors in the pursuit of nuclear power commercialization.

What did YBM Yeo do? Abruptly the MNPC without ever listening to them present the work that they have done. Is this how a minister acts? Not even giving a chance for basically a department under them to present their case before cancelling them? As I have pointed out before, nuclear power is superior to any other electricity generating technology and even more so for Malaysia. Nuclear power produces electricity which minimally releases pollutants, is stable and continuous, affordable, is least harmful to humans and most beneficial to society. Unfortunately, YBM Yeo seems so caught up with her party’s misguided stance that her professional judgment is so affected, even listening to her employees is an impossibility.

On a personal front, with Liberasi and the Malaysian Nuclear Society, I prepared a memorandum advocating for nuclear power inclusion into the Malaysian Energy Mix. I obtained an appointment and met with Mr. Najeeb and Dr. Gary Theseira from MESTECC to present my case accompanied by 2 nuclear experts. During our discussion, I was assured that nuclear power was still on the table for MESTECC and I even pledged support for helping MESTECC with educating people on it.

However, not long after our discussion, the MNPC was decided to be closed. I sent several follow-up emails to ask for explanations on a few matters, including what will happen to all the research material completed, how our local nuclear engineering graduates will be employed and how we will sustain our expertise in nuclear engineering. There was no reply. Last week I read that Dr. Gary met with activist Wong Chang-Fu on his hunger strike to urge the government to declare a Climate Crisis. I sent an email congratulating him on his proactivity and asked him again to give an appointment to discuss nuclear power. Still nothing.

On Lynas

On another track, with regards to Lynas, YBM Yeo has been proven to be wrong many times. Her party mates and herself have slandered the Australian mining corporation for many years now but have proven very little. Take for instance, the Executive Committee Report on the Operations of the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) was commissioned by MESTECC and found Lynas to be compliant whilst giving recommendations for some improvements. Nowhere was there a declaration of crisis to remove all of LAMP waste materials nor was there any indication of inherent dangers or excessive negative impacts. Rather, the report found Lynas to be an excellent investment and that highly technological industries using such metals as Lynas will grow quickly in the future.

What did YBM Yeo do? Deny, deny, deny. She insisted that Lynas wastes were dangerous and need to be removed. She pointed to previous assurances from Lynas that they are committed to removing these wastes yet she fails to state that the assurance was following the licensing agreement which states the wastes would first be attempted to be recycled, failing which they will be disposed in a Permanent Disposal Facility and if both options fails, then only will the Lynas wastes be exported. She pointed to the fact that scheduled waste storage should not exceed 180 days but failed to enlighten the masses that certain provisions, with regard to research and development efforts to recycle wastes, can be used to extend storage.

Until today, her party member YB Wong Tack spews untruths against Lynas, persistently misleading people in the hopes that he is assumed to be truthful in the court of public opinion. How has YBM Yeo responded? She insists on going to Australia to broker a deal where Lynas waste is exported there. If her claims had any basis, YBM Yeo could easily sue Lynas or ask the Attorney General to pursue litigation. If Lynas indeed were polluting Malaysia and are extremely radioactive, why not make them pay for it? Because she can’t prove a single claim.

MESTECC As A Political Vehicle

Unfortunately, for all the brains YBM Yeo seems to have, she has seemed to equally let her political bias affect the sanctity of scientific endeavour. Her war on plastics is brilliant, her stance on energy efficiency less so but still positive, yet she refuses to act decisively on energy and other matters. Further, she refuses to listen to experts even if they are her own experts from her own ministry. Even an audit report she herself commissioned has not gotten her to listen. Is it surprising, though? This government has overpromised in their election manifesto and now are slipping behind terribly in keeping their word. Ticking off Lynas and the MNPC are low-hanging fruit YBM Yeo can do to keep her and PH’s KPI up.

Yet, is it enough to retain political clout if what remains at the end is a misled electorate of unempowered individuals? Can we accept a minister that just looks good whilst underperforming and wilfully misleading the masses? MESTECC as a ministry has the responsibility to be a lynchpin in handling climate change, boosting Malaysia’s economic performance with scientific endeavours and preserving the environment. Right now, though, it seems to be but a vehicle for the political advancement of certain individuals. Are we truly holding them accountable for their transgressions?

Featured image from Malaysia SME

 

Advertisements

One thought on “MESTECC, The Best Ministry?

  1. Will the good minister and MESTECC implements such comprehensive and holistic environmental initiatives in Malaysia as Shanghai has done in the You Tube video below?

    “07/05/2019 China’s green efforts paying off / China’s bigger contribution to green initiatives”

    Below is my comment to the above video on You Tube.

    Start:
    I’m impressed with Shanghai’s comprehensive green initiatives at recycling and so forth and such efforts can only be successfully undertaken with the leadership and involvement of centralised city, provincial, regional or central government authority, coupled with the cooperation and compliance of a disciplined and committed populace as in Shanghai. Congratulations! Shanghai.

    I’m from Malaysia and from my observations here, NGO-led initiatives at greening and recycling have had limited effectiveness.

    Various state governments in Malaysia have implemented “no free single use” plastic bags and where the federal government has begun to implement “no plastic straws” at consumer level but has not implemented any comprehensive recycling policies at higher level, such as amongst the garbage collectors, no recycling bins have been placed around the towns and cities and so forth.

    Also, shoppers have the option to pay 20 Malaysian cents for a single use plastic bag and besides free single use plastic bags and plastic straws, the state and federal governments have done nothing about plastic wrappers of food a other items, plastic bottled drinks, styrofoam packing of items, which are also wrapped in plastic bags, all of which fill up my own home plastics bin faster than plastic bags and plastic straws and then I don’t know of anywhere nearby to take my plastic waste to.

    Also, it was funny when I went to buy a root beer that there was a sign saying that they did not give out plastic straws any more but my root beer came with a single-use plastic spoon, which will just end up in the garbage.

    Thus I feel that the the “no free single-use plastic bags” and “no plastic straws” initiatives in Malaysia are merely token gestures to look “green” in the eyes of the world, or is just so that the state and federal government elected representatives involved can feel good about themselves.

    Sure, they can learn from Shanghai’s greening and recycling initiatives but whether they will implement the same kind of system here is doubtful.
    END:

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.